On the recordSeptember 23, 2004
I rise today regarding the tax bill before the Senate that would extend certain tax provisions set to expire this year. Let me say that I support the policy underlying the tax measures contained in this conference report. What I find regrettable, however, is that we are even at this juncture where we are faced essentially with a choice between these tax reductions and fiscal responsibility-- when, in fact, we could have achieved both. Instead, we have before us a tax package that will directly add $146 billion to the Federal deficit. Why? Because the 2003 tax package sunset after one year rightfully popular measures of benefit to middle-class and lower income Americans--that also provided short term economic stimulus--this year, in order to pay for other tax reductions over 5 years that are not geared toward short-term stimulus. As a result, here we are, about to enact 5 years of $146 billion in tax reductions over and above the $350 billion we passed last year--when we could have provided for 5 years of these same, worthy tax cut measures with last year's $350 billion package. I supported the $1.35 trillion, 10-year tax relief plan of 2001 because, at that time, the tax burden was the highest it had been since World War II--and also to provide an 'insurance policy,' to paraphrase Chairman Greenspan, against a more prolonged economic recession that we now know began six months before President Bush took office.
Source
govinfo.gov




