Today, the House considered the Omnibus appropriations measure for Fiscal Year 2003. It is the legal duty of the Congress to fund the government, and the time to vote on this funding was long overdue. As is often the case, the majority decided to use this desperately-need bill as a vehicle to insert 'riders' and other language that would be unlikely to pass on its own. In this bill, there was language that would open the way to preliminary studies of the feasibility of oil drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. There was language that would increase logging in national forests. There was a cut to conservation programs, and a severe underfunding of border security and first responders money. I object to these provisions in the strongest terms. This is a sneaky, underhanded way of creating policy. At a time when funding for so many valuable programs in Maine and across the country is desperately needed, it is wrong to extort the Members of Congress into voting on these highly controversial measures.
Editor's note · Context
Addressing the Omnibus appropriations measure for Fiscal Year 2003 and its controversial provisions.
Share
More from Mike Michaud
We are also partnering with the VA in their MyVA Community Initiative to encourage community-driven solutions for veterans.
And so our bill, the PAWS Act, takes these veterans, particularly the ones that have severe Post-Traumatic Stress, and authorizes a small amount of funding so that the VA can pair them with specially trained service dogs.
I think that is so important in a job like this one which is really about administration and about problem-solving and about getting things done on behalf of our veterans.
Some veterans think that because of veterans preference, that they will automatically be hired in the Federal services. That is not the case.





