the gentleman's amendment is going to make some technical changes that are going to make an objectionable bill a little bit better. It is going to delete provisions saying that governments cannot deny equal access to benefits on the basis of religion. But still, in the underlying bill, as it was in 1960 for President Kennedy, as it is for us today and for the Founding Fathers when this country was established, there has been a belief in a separation of the church and State which is absolute. This amendment is in search of a problem. It is based on the false premise that the Constitution merely prohibits the establishment of a national religion. In fact, the first Congress considered and rejected earlier drafts of the First Amendment that would have simply prohibited a national religion. So this amendment would effectively permit the government to sponsor religious expression. The Bishop amendment is going to go to make these technical changes, but the underlying amendment to the Constitution that is being proposed is an amendment that would effectively permit the government to sponsor religious expression. Whose prayer will be used? If prayers are read over the intercom, where do students go who object to prayer going on during that time? Would the government be required to financially support religions, and which ones? The fact remains that religion has not been shut out of the public square or public school.
Editor's note · Context
Debating an amendment related to the separation of church and state.
Share
More from John Baldacci
I have long supported the efforts of Mr. Norwood to reform managed care. Unfortunately, I cannot support my friend's lastest legislative effort on this issue. Instead, I remain strongly in favor of the Ganske-Dingell-Berry bill, H.R. 2563…
I will join many of my colleagues in opposing this irresponsible plan. I have many concerns about the resolution. It fails to take the necessary steps to keep our economy going strong so that all parts of our country can benefit. It does…
I appreciate my colleagues who have joined me this evening to share their concerns about this issue and offer practical solutions to the problem. Before I close, I would like to discuss a couple of measures that are or have the capacity to…
The Texas Compact Act was passed by a floor vote of 309-107 in the House. The Texas compact has bipartisan support in its member States, in Congress and in the Nation. Congress has approved nine similar compacts for 41 States without…





