This amendment seeks to undo a bipartisan agreement to increase authorized funding for our military that the Armed Services Committee collectively concluded is appropriate given the realities of today's evolving national security threats. We are faced with some serious threats globally, such as ongoing terrorist threats; the potential for nuclear proliferation in the Middle East; tensions in the South China Sea; Russia's invasion of a democratic state in Europe; incredible technological advancements that we cannot fall behind on in AI, quantum computing, and biotechnology; increasing competition in space and cyberspace; disinformation campaigns; and data surveillance that strengthen authoritarian regimes and lend themselves to attacks on democratic societies. The amendment that I offered invests in our Navy, which is critically important right now. It invests in missile defense, which is very necessary, given advancing technologies in things like hypersonics, R&D for AI, biotechnology, and quantum computing, as I discussed. Importantly, it increases critical assistance to the Ukrainian military as it fights to defend democracy from Russian aggression. As our military seeks to prepare to grapple with these new, future realities, it must also do so in the face of significant supply chain disruptions resulting from COVID and from rising inflation which my amendment also addresses.…
Share
More from Jared Golden
the deadline really does need to be moved. Of course, myself, and most, well, all of the Maine delegation opposed the regulations to begin with.
Some people have raised concerns about training. Well, last September many of us called on the administration to start training in F-16, or fourth-generation aircraft. And of course that hasn't even begun. So the time to start this process…
In talking about one of the previous amendments, I pointed out this was part of a bipartisan agreement to increase the top line by $37 billion. Compromise really requires people to set different priorities, come to the table, and find an…
I would agree with you that some of their policies as I stated earlier as an example up in Alaska are the wrong calls. And I would condemn that.





