Political Quotes

On the recordAugust 1, 1996
I want to salute both the chairman as well as the ranking member for their leadership during the past year. It has been superb. They have really set a standard. I think that there is a lot that we can be proud of in this bill. I am certainly glad to see the retention of the depot language for the 60/40 split, but I am also proud that we have finally introduced the concept of multiyear procurement. We have expanded the concept from the C-17 program, which is going to see a procurement of 80 aircraft over the next 7 years, but we are also not cutting the budget, we are not increasing it, we are maintaining stable funding. A good part of that stable funding is being used to add to a multiyear procurement plan for Aegis destroyers, the result of which is going to be that over the next 5 years, if the plan is fulfilled, we will produce one more destroyer at $1 billion less in cost, or, if you will, 15 destroyers over 5 years for $1 billion less than it would cost us to buy 14 through normal procurement methods. Again with the threats we face in the world, now is not the time to cut defense but at the same time through more efficient management we can stabilize the funding and get more value for our dollars.
Said by
James Longley
Republican · Maine

Editor's note · Context

Discussing defense procurement and budget stability during a floor speech.

Share

More from James Longley

Aug 1, 1995

I stand here as a past opponent of lifting the embargo, but not necessarily as a supporter of the administration's policies in that part of the world. I think we have been vacillating and indecisive, and I think we have invested far more…

govinfo.gov
Jul 23, 1996

the debate this afternoon is not necessarily about the Legal Services Corporation. It is about the Federal obligation to provide legal assistance to those who need it. And, yes, that is a Federal responsibility. I have no love necessarily…

govinfo.gov
Jun 13, 1996

the reason we are debating these amendments to this trade agreement today is that we are seeking at least some element of fairness to our shipbuilders. The reason we are debating these amendments is that we believe it is important to…

govinfo.gov
Jun 13, 1996

I will be supporting the Bateman amendments, but I also want to make clear that I do not think the shipbuilding agreement itself is the solution. It will in all likelihood make much more difficult if not impossible U.S. shipbuilders'…

govinfo.gov

Other voices in this conversation