Thus far in our history, settlement has only been the basis of new agitation, and each successive agitation leads again to new settlement.
James Blaine: “Thus far in our history, settlement has only been the basis of new agitation, and each successive agitation leads again…”
Editor's note · Context
Blaine suggests that political settlements often lead to new controversies rather than lasting resolutions.
Share
More from James Blaine
Under such circumstances, to send a military force into any State, with orders to act against the people, would be simply making war upon them.
And if Congress shall break up the present Union by unconstitutionally putting strife and enmity and armed hostility between different sections of the country, instead of the domestic tranquility which the Constitution was meant to insure…
Is any portion of the people bound to contribute their money or their blood to carry on a contest like that?
But what if the feeling in any State against the United States should become so universal that the Federal officers themselves (including judges, district attorneys, and marshals) would be reached by the same influences, and resign their…





