The new application made the interests of neutral commerce the supreme factor in determining how far belligerent rights should be respected.
James Blaine: “The new application made the interests of neutral commerce the supreme factor in determining how far belligerent rights…”
Editor's note · Context
Blaine argues that the interests of neutral commerce should be prioritized in determining the respect for belligerent rights.
Share
More from James Blaine
If it be true that war cannot be declared, nor a system of general hostilities carried on by the Central Government against a State, then it seems to follow that an attempt to do so would be ipso facto an expulsion of such State from the…
But what if the feeling in any State against the United States should become so universal that the Federal officers themselves (including judges, district attorneys, and marshals) would be reached by the same influences, and resign their…
But this is a totally different thing from an offensive war to punish the people for the political misdeeds of their State Government, or to enforce an acknowledgment that the Government of the United States is supreme.
All these provisions are made to protect the States, not to authorize an attack by one part of the country upon another; to preserve the peace, and not to plunge them into civil war.





