On the record
You settle that hereafter a party having a sufficient majority in the House and the Senate can depose the President of the United States.
Source
gutenberg.orgJames Blaine: “You settle that hereafter a party having a sufficient majority in the House and the Senate can depose the President of…”
Editor's note · Context
Blaine warns that allowing a party to remove a president sets a dangerous precedent for future governance.
Share
More from James Blaine
But this is a totally different thing from an offensive war to punish the people for the political misdeeds of their State Government, or to enforce an acknowledgment that the Government of the United States is supreme.
You can use force only to repel an assault on the public property and aid the Courts in the performance of their duty.
The States are colleagues of one another, and if some of them shall conquer the rest, and hold them as subjugated provinces, it would totally destroy the whole theory upon which they are now connected.
If this view of the subject be correct, as I think it is, then the Union must utterly perish at the moment when Congress shall arm one part of the people against another for any purpose beyond that of merely protecting the General…
Other voices in this conversation
