If the Missouri Compromise had not been repealed, a free State was assured.
James Blaine: “If the Missouri Compromise had not been repealed, a free State was assured.”
Editor's note · Context
Blaine argues that the repeal of the Missouri Compromise had significant consequences for Kansas's statehood.
Share
More from James Blaine
You can use force only to repel an assault on the public property and aid the Courts in the performance of their duty.
And if Congress shall break up the present Union by unconstitutionally putting strife and enmity and armed hostility between different sections of the country, instead of the domestic tranquility which the Constitution was meant to insure…
Without the exercise of those functions which belong exclusively to the civil service, the laws cannot be executed in any event, no matter what may be the physical strength which the Government has at its command.
If this view of the subject be correct, as I think it is, then the Union must utterly perish at the moment when Congress shall arm one part of the people against another for any purpose beyond that of merely protecting the General…





