Whether one man could hold property in another was a question which took deep hold of the consciences of men, and was either right or wrong in itself.
James Blaine: “Whether one man could hold property in another was a question which took deep hold of the consciences of men, and was…”
Editor's note · Context
Blaine reflects on the moral implications of property ownership and slavery.
Share
More from James Blaine
Without the exercise of those functions which belong exclusively to the civil service, the laws cannot be executed in any event, no matter what may be the physical strength which the Government has at its command.
The States are colleagues of one another, and if some of them shall conquer the rest, and hold them as subjugated provinces, it would totally destroy the whole theory upon which they are now connected.
You can use force only to repel an assault on the public property and aid the Courts in the performance of their duty.
The right of the General Government to preserve itself in its whole constitutional vigor by repelling a direct and positive aggression upon its property or its officers cannot be denied.





