The sober reflection of later years has persuaded many who favored Impeachment that it was not justifiable on the charges made, and that its success would have resulted in greater injury to free institutions than Andrew Johnson in his utmost endeavor was able to inflict.
James Blaine: “The sober reflection of later years has persuaded many who favored Impeachment that it was not justifiable on the…”
Editor's note · Context
Blaine reflects on the impeachment of Andrew Johnson, suggesting that it may have been unjustifiable and potentially harmful to free institutions.
Share
More from James Blaine
You can use force only to repel an assault on the public property and aid the Courts in the performance of their duty.
All these provisions are made to protect the States, not to authorize an attack by one part of the country upon another; to preserve the peace, and not to plunge them into civil war.
But this is a totally different thing from an offensive war to punish the people for the political misdeeds of their State Government, or to enforce an acknowledgment that the Government of the United States is supreme.
Under such circumstances, to send a military force into any State, with orders to act against the people, would be simply making war upon them.





