No neutral has the right to make or accept such an interpolation into the recognized and essential principles of the law of maritime warfare.
James Blaine: “No neutral has the right to make or accept such an interpolation into the recognized and essential principles of the law…”
Editor's note · Context
Blaine argues against the right of neutrals to alter established maritime warfare principles.
Share
More from James Blaine
All these provisions are made to protect the States, not to authorize an attack by one part of the country upon another; to preserve the peace, and not to plunge them into civil war.
Is any portion of the people bound to contribute their money or their blood to carry on a contest like that?
But what if the feeling in any State against the United States should become so universal that the Federal officers themselves (including judges, district attorneys, and marshals) would be reached by the same influences, and resign their…
But this is a totally different thing from an offensive war to punish the people for the political misdeeds of their State Government, or to enforce an acknowledgment that the Government of the United States is supreme.





