A flagrant offense against the Constitution and the laws had, in the judgment of a majority of its members, been committed by the President.
James Blaine: “A flagrant offense against the Constitution and the laws had, in the judgment of a majority of its members, been…”
Editor's note · Context
Blaine critiques the actions of the President, highlighting a constitutional violation.
Share
More from James Blaine
You can use force only to repel an assault on the public property and aid the Courts in the performance of their duty.
But this is a totally different thing from an offensive war to punish the people for the political misdeeds of their State Government, or to enforce an acknowledgment that the Government of the United States is supreme.
Is any portion of the people bound to contribute their money or their blood to carry on a contest like that?
And if Congress shall break up the present Union by unconstitutionally putting strife and enmity and armed hostility between different sections of the country, instead of the domestic tranquility which the Constitution was meant to insure…





