The gentleman's amendment would prohibit funds in the act from being used to lobby on the waters of the U.S. There is an existing prohibition on lobbying that applies to all Federal employees that has been in place since 1919, so this is an unnecessary and redundant amendment. I would remind my colleagues that Federal employees are not prohibited from providing information to Congress on legislation, policies, or programs. There must be an open dialogue between the legislative and executive branches to ensure that laws are being implemented appropriately and programs achieve their intended goals. We should not and cannot operate in an information vacuum. We don't need to add extraneous, redundant provisions to a bill that is already overburdened with harmful legislative riders. I urge my colleagues to oppose the amendment, and I reserve the balance of my time.
Chellie Pingree: “The gentleman's amendment would prohibit funds in the act from being used to lobby on the waters of the U.S. There is an…”
Share
More from Chellie Pingree
The people impacted by this funding freeze are hardworking, rural Americans and small businesses.
Any time I hear one of my colleagues across the aisle say we don't need the EPA or that the actions of the EPA are extortion or retaliatory, I don't know about the specific actions that he is talking about today, but I do know, as someone…
I am sorry to say that this is a terrible farm bill. As a result of this bill, more people will go hungry, more farmers will lose assistance to the conservation programs that are already oversubscribed, and more farmers who are struggling…
Pesticide preemption has received an extraordinary amount of attention in the past year, as is appropriate when the Federal Government considers overriding States' rights. Litigation on this topic was discussed at the Supreme Court on…





