I strongly oppose this amendment. I appreciate the thoughts of the gentleman, but this is the wrong place to go about it. This amendment just indiscriminately cuts programs in this bill without any thought to the relative merit of the programs contained in the bill. For instance, this cut would result in fewer patients seen at the Indian Health Service, fewer safety inspectors ensuring accidents do not occur, deferred maintenance on our Nation's water and sanitation infrastructure. More generally, investments in our environmental infrastructure and our public lands will be halted and the associated jobs will be lost. This amendment would not encourage the agencies to do more with less. Simply put, it would force the agencies and our constituents to do less with less. Yes, it is true the Interior budget does not meet the same numbers that the President sent over to us, but the President cut the Environmental Protection Agency by a third, he cut the National Endowment for the Arts, the National Endowment for the Humanities. I can make a very long list that the President cut that this Congress would never stand for. So this does not stand. We cannot go back to the President's original budget. We must stand together to oppose this amendment, which if it was passed, would harm the American people. Mr. Chair, I oppose this amendment and encourage my colleagues to join me in opposing it, and I yield back the balance of my time. The Acting CHAIR.…
Share
More from Chellie Pingree
We are here to protect the welfare of the American public, and this provision prevents a fair return to the American taxpayer from oil and gas leasing conducted on public lands. By prohibiting the modernization of the Mineral Leasing Act…
I demand a recorded vote. The Acting CHAIR. Pursuant to clause 6 of rule XVIII, further proceedings on the amendment offered by the gentleman from Pennsylvania will be postponed. Amendment No. 84 Offered by Mr. Perry The Acting CHAIR. It…
My colleague on the other side of the aisle says this is a measure to give relief to the American consumer and is pro-middle class. First off, I don't know how anyone with a straight face has a giveaway to the oil and gas industry and says…
It just seems like it would be a horrific time to lose those research capacities and also give up the body of research that we already have.





