On the recordNovember 2, 2023
To be clear, I fully support all oversight efforts and believe the mission of the inspectors general across government is vital, but I disagree with the offset and the treatment of the EPA in this bill generally. In the base bill, the EPA is cut by nearly 40 percent. Every single account is cut except for the Office of the Inspector General. Quite frankly, the inspector general's office does pretty well under this bill. Cutting every single program at the EPA and seeking to increase funding for only one office, which happens to be the oversight office, is a clear attempt by the majority to politicize the inspector general, and that is unacceptable. Mr. Chair, I oppose this amendment, and I yield back the balance of my time. Mr. McCORMICK. Mr. Chair, I reiterate that my amendment reduces funding for the overbearing EPA, increases funding of EPA oversight, and cuts spending by $2 million. Mr. Chairman, I urge my colleagues to support this amendment, and I yield back the balance of my time. The Acting CHAIR. The question is on the amendment offered by the gentleman from Georgia (Mr. McCormick). The amendment was agreed to. The Acting CHAIR. The Chair understands that amendment No. 41 will not be offered. Amendment No. 58 Offered by Mr. Westerman The Acting CHAIR. It is now in order to consider amendment No. 58 printed in part A of House Report 118-261.





