I take it, from looking at both your reports, that you would want tax reform to be done in a way that maintains at least the current progressivity of the Tax Code.
I think it is important, as we look at this challenge, to look at both sides of the equation there.
If we are to keep in place the tax cuts that were implemented in 2001, 2003 rather than allow them to lapse... we would have much larger def...
Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Thank you, Mr. Barthold, for your testimony.
I just don't think--I think people need to take that into account.
Isn't that right?
nondefense discretionary spending is shrinking dramatically over the next 10 years.
the top 400 richest Americans, all making over $110 million per year and making an average of $271 million a year, paid only 18 percent of t...
If that were to lapse and that would mean that working people had less disposable income, especially at this point in time, that would also ...
So now to get back to your scoring, though, when tax cuts are scored, whether they were 2001, 2003, because you do not take into account som...
On CBO, when they score investments, when CBO looks at the investment side, investment infrastructure and education, they don't take into ac...