The debate today is about doing something for the living as opposed to doing something for the dead. We could well afford in this institution today to provide a prescription drug benefit that was fixed for Medicare recipients. Instead, we are coming to this floor today to assist those who really do not need it. Let me, if I can, quote again the editorial from the Washington Post that appeared this morning. ``The House will be asked today to approve a tax cut so blatantly irresponsible that the authors have, in effect, had to white out the cost.'' In other words, the phase-in of the estate tax repeal is so slow that the $660 billion cost of immediate repeal has been reduced to $185 billion. That was the point of an amendment offered last week in the Committee on Ways and Means. But there is even a more fundamental point here. It is that the committee majority could not figure out how to handle the true cost of repeal, given their other priorities, so they manipulated the budget rules to make it fit the 10-year window.
Rich Neal: “The debate today is about doing something for the living as opposed to doing something for the dead. We could well…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing the implications of tax cuts and budget rules during a debate on prescription drug benefits.
Share
More from Rich Neal
let's look at the numbers: 15 million people are about to be kicked off their health insurance because of the big, ugly law; 24 million Americans are going to pay higher premiums, in some cases, up to 75 percent. I am in opposition to this…
The public doesn't oftentimes get to see this part of Congress where Republicans and Democrats come together to honor a true friend on days on which we agreed and disagreed, but I think Jan Schakowsky summed up the earnestness of our pal…
Well, the looting is underway. Our colleagues are running the same failed playbook of trickle-down handouts. My friend, the gentleman from Pennsylvania (Mr. Smucker) said the family of four is going to get $1,700. Look at the tax…





