On the recordMarch 21, 2016
But the argument instead was, this is going to spur a lot of new investment. And that really didn't happen.
Source
congress.govBut the argument instead was, this is going to spur a lot of new investment. And that really didn't happen.
Neal critiques the assumption that tax changes would lead to significant new investments.
Share & report
More from Rich Neal
The answer is to bake a bigger pie so that people can participate, and I am all in on that suggestion.
I believe the only reason to work to cut the IRS budget is to either make consumer services worse or to make cheating on your taxes easier.