The argument we somehow cannot legislate safety. Let us be clear about the purpose of this amendment that is offered by the gentleman from Indiana (Mr. Hostettler). His objective is very simple and it is to put Smith & Wesson out of business. I represent the city where Smith & Wesson is located. They essentially are being punished for doing the right thing. This is sound public policy, not policy that was put upon them. It was negotiated after months of intense conversations back and forth. What Smith & Wesson said in this historic agreement is this, and I want everybody to listen to this, they want to change the way guns are designed, distributed and marketed. They want to add locking devices and other safety features, and they wanted to develop landmark smart gun technology. We ask ourselves in this Chamber who could be against all of that?
Rich Neal: “The argument we somehow cannot legislate safety. Let us be clear about the purpose of this amendment that is offered by…”
On the recordJune 21, 2000
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing gun safety legislation and the implications for Smith & Wesson.
Share
More from Rich Neal
Jun 25, 2024
When we listen to people telling us about their own experiences, it can be very helpful and certainly enhance better policies for people like them.
Feb 11, 2026
I led the negotiation on USMCA, and 195 Republicans voted for USMCA and 197 Democrats voted for USMCA. It was a bipartisan effort. Tariffs, as threatened or imposed, can have an outcome, but not when we look at Brazil and say that we don't…
Jun 25, 2024
We have a special responsibility to protect them from abuse and further turmoil, and also to deliver supports that will let them set out on a path to success.





