That strikes me as very bad prioritization.

That strikes me as insane. Get that money to work. Put people to work.

I am not against that. I am a liberal. I don't mind taxing people for things they want.

We are faced with another situation. People want more money than we have. Gee, how unusual. Never heard that before.

I have confidence in Director Cordray. And I want to congratulate the CFPB, for example, for last week's announcement...

Why in the world would we want them to--if they have to get to the point where they ever have to use a subpoena, why would we want to force a reimbursement?

I guess I also want to talk about the reimbursement aspect.

I think there will be some good discussion today.

Why should we get rid of the orderly liquidation as a final backup opportunity?

I really have to go back to Mr. Schwarcz's comments. I have no problem with the concept of State-based regulation.

I think that the capital standards issue could be put on a suspension calendar and passed overwhelmingly.