We are making money, we are actually costing homeowners more than they should be charged so that we can use it as a piggy bank, yet we can't have an honest discussion on how to fix it.
Michael Capuano
The Public Record
We want to talk about how bad Dodd-Frank is. We don't want to talk about the things we can come to an agreement on to fix some of the things.
This is another one of these show-and-tell hearings with apparently no purpose to it.
I continue waiting for my Republican colleagues to acknowledge, as Mr. Greenspan has, that they have found a flaw in free market ideology.
This is another example of this Administration's intent to pick winners and losers in our economy, and I can no longer support the authorization of the Ex-Im Bank.
The Ex-Im Bank's guidance is bad for our Nation's economy, bad for the development of future technologies, and bad for the environment.
When the Ex-Im Bank goes away, government will still be picking winners and losers.
We are not talking about reforming the Export-Import Bank here. It is going away.
If every country in the world would legitimately shut down their ex-im bank or their comparable one to it, I would consider it because I don't disagree.
I don't live in the ivory tower. In the ivory tower, what you say makes sense.





