The expenditure in nuclear programs is far beyond what we need to be expending in nuclear programs. That is as simple as one can say it. The increase in nuclear programs in this budget is by a very significant amount over the previous year when we have such great other needs. The amendment that the gentleman has proposed returns $56 million to the Treasury, which by the way is about similar to the amount that was involved in the amendment that had been offered by the gentleman from New York seeking only an additional $50 million for renewable energy research programs. It seems to me that that would be a far, far better way to use the $56 million that otherwise would be returned to the Treasury by the gentleman from Ohio and his amendment.
John W. Olver: “The expenditure in nuclear programs is far beyond what we need to be expending in nuclear programs. That is as simple as…”
Editor's note · Context
Speaking in support of an amendment regarding nuclear program expenditures and renewable energy funding.
Share
More from John W. Olver
My very competent staff tells me that we have been requiring this in the Mexican trucking controversy over the past few years. We've been fighting over that one back and forth for years and years now, and I can't remember whether there was…
I will be brief. I wish the gentleman from Minnesota great luck in solving this one. I am so happy for the people on that side of the aisle who must be just ecstatic--ecstatic--that they have a President who will take all of these things…
I will be very brief. I serve on the Homeland Security Subcommittee for Appropriations, and I don't think that the Homeland Security authorizers have done anything along these lines, and that's where it really ought to be dealt with, I…
I think that what the chairman has said is probably about as good as it gets. What we have now is a slightly amended version of the proposal. My understanding is that the major long-distance trucking companies are against this language and…





