the Republicans then make extreme cuts in health care, in education, in job training, in environmental protection, in research and development, in public transportation and economic development, and they leave the Nation in the year 2002 with over $6 trillion of debt and no revenue to pay it back because they have cut up front the revenue that would be possibly usable for paying that debt back, and that leaves us with $240 billion at least of interest payments on that debt year, after year, after year, without hope of an end to it. But such extremism really is not necessary to balance the budget. Both the coalition budget and the President's balanced budget prove that. So I urge my colleagues to reject this rule and this blueprint for failure. Vote no on this rule and on the conference report.
John W. Olver: “the Republicans then make extreme cuts in health care, in education, in job training, in environmental protection, in…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing budget cuts and their impact during a debate on a proposed rule.
Share
More from John W. Olver
Reclaiming my time, the language of the amendment, as I have it before me, says none of the funds made available by this Act may be used for high-speed rail in the State of California, or for the California High-Speed Rail Authority.
There are no funds made available in this Act for high-speed rail. None. And so, since this is a 1-year bill, I don't think this amendment does very much. The gentleman from California has a problem with a process that has been going on…
In any case, I don't object to the amendment, and I yield back the balance of my time. The Acting CHAIR. The question is on the amendment offered by the gentleman from Louisiana (Mr. Cassidy). The amendment was agreed to. Amendment Offered…
I think I'm doing the correct thing there. And I'll yield, again, for the continuation of what the gentleman from California is saying.





