I want to say that I am a supporter of Moving to Work; but the language here is clearly authorizing language, and we have not been accepting authorizing language at any point in this debate. So, I would be very happy to work with the gentleman on the Moving to Work program, and urge him to withdraw the amendment.
Discussing an amendment related to the Moving to Work program.
Share
More from John W. Olver
Reclaiming my time, at my age, I can't remember what happened several days ago, and that is quite some time ago. But, you know, it will slowly come back. Eventually, it slowly comes back. I yield back the balance of my time. The Acting…
I move to strike the last word. The Acting CHAIR. The gentleman from Massachusetts is recognized.
There are no funds made available in this Act for high-speed rail. None. And so, since this is a 1-year bill, I don't think this amendment does very much. The gentleman from California has a problem with a process that has been going on…
This amendment again, as the gentleman has said, is an amendment that would freeze at the level of the 2012 funding here for salaries and expenses of the Office of Community Planning and Development. Now, this office, it turns out…
Other voices in this conversation
