I oppose the rule because this bill is a sham. It covers only the poorest senior citizens whose incomes place them near or below the poverty standard. It deliberately creates another division in America: us who are wealthy enough to take care of ourselves and them who are given a taxpayer handout because they are poor. In fact, the Republican plan is carefully designed to fail, not immediately, of course, certainly not before the November election. It is being polished to look like gold until after the election. But next year when everyone realizes this plan was virtually useless and worthless, fool's gold, that failure will be used as a spear to attack Medicare, the hammer the Republicans hope to use to privatize Medicare. That is the bottom line, privatization. Eliminate the Medicare program that provides universal, dependable, quality, guaranteed health insurance for every senior citizen by right of American citizenship. This bill is political chicanery at its very worst.
John W. Olver: “I oppose the rule because this bill is a sham. It covers only the poorest senior citizens whose incomes place them near…”
Editor's note · Context
Opposing a bill related to Medicare during a House floor debate.
Share
More from John W. Olver
Here we have kind of the yang that went with the yin. The gentleman's amendment here a few minutes ago, the last one that he offered, was $3.5 billion, and taking that out of this allocation. {time} 1420 In this case, it's a $6 million…
I move to strike the last word. The Acting CHAIR. The gentleman from Massachusetts is recognized.
I think I'm doing the correct thing there. And I'll yield, again, for the continuation of what the gentleman from California is saying.
I will be very brief. I serve on the Homeland Security Subcommittee for Appropriations, and I don't think that the Homeland Security authorizers have done anything along these lines, and that's where it really ought to be dealt with, I…





