In fact, your office exemplifies the choice presented by the allocation, whether to throw low-income tenants out on the streets or to defer capital expenditures and allow Federal housing investments to deteriorate.
John W. Olver: “In fact, your office exemplifies the choice presented by the allocation, whether to throw low-income tenants out on the…”
Editor's note · Context
Olver criticizes budget allocations affecting low-income tenants and housing investments.
Share
More from John W. Olver
In any case, I don't object to the amendment, and I yield back the balance of my time. The Acting CHAIR. The question is on the amendment offered by the gentleman from Louisiana (Mr. Cassidy). The amendment was agreed to. Amendment Offered…
Reclaiming my time, we have no idea whether the Supreme Court will take this case. In the meantime, until such time it is taken and they do it, and we can't assume that, then the actions of HUD are proper in reaching a disparate impact…
I will be very brief. I merely want to concur in the position of the chairman of the subcommittee, and I urge a ``no'' vote on the amendment. I yield back the balance of my time. The Acting CHAIR. The question is on the amendment offered…
The issue here seems to be--and I don't know this very well. The issue seems to be that there have been cases where discrimination has occurred, and it has been adjudicated as having occurred when there was no intent to do so in the first…





