Mr. Speaker, this is a simple motion. It should not be controversial. These United States are on the verge of embarking on what could be a $60 billion National Missile Defense program. This House included more than adequate funding to start the early lead construction items of the National Missile Defense as it is now conceived. The other Chamber has funded this item at a substantially and unnecessarily higher level. This motion instructs the conferees to insist on the more prudent level of spending in the House bill; 367 Members of the House supported this level of spending when we passed the bill several weeks ago, and it is important that we maintain our position.
John W. Olver: “Mr. Speaker, this is a simple motion. It should not be controversial. These United States are on the verge of embarking…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing funding levels for the National Missile Defense program during House floor debate.
Share
More from John W. Olver
Well, I don't know how this amendment is going to solve the problem that you have exactly, but the chairman has agreed to adopt it. So I will state an objection because I really don't understand how this is going to solve your problem, but…
Woman, I demand a recorded vote. The Acting CHAIR. Pursuant to clause 6 of rule XVIII, further proceedings on the amendment offered by the gentleman from Louisiana will be postponed. Amendment Offered by Mr. Scalise
And this was an executive order promulgated by President Clinton or by President Bush?
There are no funds made available in this Act for high-speed rail. None. And so, since this is a 1-year bill, I don't think this amendment does very much. The gentleman from California has a problem with a process that has been going on…





