I just want to express that this amendment for a program which is totally authorized, and we are not running above the authorization number on Amtrak by any means at all, but this is a killer amendment for Amtrak to remove all of their capital funds, as this amendment purports to do. So I oppose the amendment, and urge a ``no'' vote on the amendment.
The speaker opposes an amendment that would remove capital funds from Amtrak.
Share
More from John W. Olver
At this point, I really don't know whether your understanding is anywhere close to mine. I think this is an amendment deserving of opposition, so I am opposing the amendment. I think this amendment should not be adopted, and you can do as…
Well, I don't know how this amendment is going to solve the problem that you have exactly, but the chairman has agreed to adopt it. So I will state an objection because I really don't understand how this is going to solve your problem, but…
Reclaiming my time, the language of the amendment, as I have it before me, says none of the funds made available by this Act may be used for high-speed rail in the State of California, or for the California High-Speed Rail Authority.
My very competent staff tells me that we have been requiring this in the Mexican trucking controversy over the past few years. We've been fighting over that one back and forth for years and years now, and I can't remember whether there was…
Other voices in this conversation
