No, there is none. There is none. But the offset that the gentleman has used is salaries and expenses, salaries and expenses is an account which, in the tightness of this budget, in trying to do for section 8 and CDBG and the other places, we have already cut a bit, not a great deal, but a bit, and I oppose, as I said before, in good conscience, the movement of salaries and expense moneys into this where we know that it is not going to be spent with any alacrity and any expedition.
John W. Olver: “No, there is none. There is none. But the offset that the gentleman has used is salaries and expenses, salaries and…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing budget allocations and the movement of funds during a House floor debate.
Share
More from John W. Olver
The amendment that has been offered removes a 3 percent increase in the administrative account for the Office of Public and Indian Housing. I rise to oppose the amendment. In this instance, the cuts in the Office of Public and Indian…
I rise in opposition. The Acting CHAIR. The gentleman from Massachusetts is recognized for 5 minutes.
Now at this point we have--I think this is the last of this group of amendments that have been proposed in this area, in essence. And when you put them together, because one was for $6.5 million, one was for about $5 million, then there…
How does that guarantee that California's gas tax moneys will not be used for high-speed rail?





