Political Quotes

John Tierney: But as the gentleman from Massachusetts (Mr. McGovern) mentioned, there are other good things that could have and should…

On the recordJuly 9, 2003
But as the gentleman from Massachusetts (Mr. McGovern) mentioned, there are other good things that could have and should have been in this bill that unfortunately have been set aside because of the self-inflicted situation where the majority in this House has chosen to take money and throw it out the door to people who are already wealthy and decide not to invest in the children of this country. If we want to talk about future productivity, if we want to talk about a way of improving our education system in this country, then we would try to make sure that our early childhood programs and Head Start in particular would have every opportunity for success. Instead, the Committee on Education and the Workforce get a budget that is so small that they have to then work within those constraints and come back and tell us, gee, we do not have enough money to do all the right things that we need to do.
Said by
John Tierney
Massachusetts

Editor's note · Context

Discussing the shortcomings of a bill related to education funding.

Share

More from John Tierney

Jul 24, 2014

I am, in its present form. The SPEAKER pro tempore. The Clerk will report the motion to recommit. The Clerk read as follows: Mr. Tierney moves to recommit the bill, H.R. 4984, to the Committee on Education and the Workforce with…

govinfo.gov
Apr 28, 2014

There is always a reason. And when you talk about prioritizing, we had amendment after amendment on the Republican side to cut special ed, to provide money for another program.

congress.gov
Jul 24, 2014

I demand a recorded vote. A recorded vote was ordered. The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursuant to clause 8 and clause 9 of rule XX, this 5-minute vote on the motion to recommit will be followed by 5- minute votes on passage of the bill, if…

govinfo.gov
Apr 28, 2014

I think, two points, most appalling are that on Pell Grants, it would eliminate some $90 billion of the mandatory funding that we have already paid for going forward and then when you talk about student loan repayment benefits, it would…

congress.gov

Other voices in this conversation