The true fact of the matter is we only have to look at scientists. There are a number of people missing from this debate that would not be in favor of national missile defense. They are basically most scientists, our European allies and friends in other countries and a large part of our military. The fact of the matter also is that we do not rely on the same technology for NASA that we rely on for the missiles because if NASA fails, we understand that we need to go forward in there, we can have other attempts at this. If we are relying on a missile defense system and it fails, we are all dead. The fact of the matter is we need to test to make sure it works. This system has never fully tested the exact system that will be used ultimately. It has never shown that that would work.
John Tierney: “The true fact of the matter is we only have to look at scientists. There are a number of people missing from this debate…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing concerns about national missile defense and its implications during a floor speech.
Share
More from John Tierney
At this point in time, I yield such time as he may consume to the gentleman from Illinois (Mr. Danny K. Davis) to engage in a colloquy.
Understand, I hear horror stories--you know, my constituents calling me--that would stand your hair on end about the way they are being treated by folks like that who end up putting them in a worse situation than they would otherwise be if…
I thank my colleague for yielding. Mr. Speaker, I rise to urge the House to act on responsible legislation that I have introduced that would help tens of millions of college students, graduates, parents, and middle class families all…
I need to express my wish to have the unemployment benefits extended as soon as possible.





