This is not just an esoteric procedural debate. I was insulted when the gentleman on the other said, ``Well, so what if we're bringing up this bill delivered, one copy, to the Democratic side at 3:30 in the morning. They wouldn't have read it any way.'' Well, I was here a few years ago, and I read the catastrophic care bill before it came to the floor of the House. I was one of the few Democrats to vote against it, and a whole heck of a lot of people had to change their votes a year later because they cast their vote for a bad bill. This bill is a bad bill. I will not yield to the gentleman. This bill is a bad bill. But we are not going to be allowed time to read it. If we split this up among the 200 or so Democrats here, we would have a hard time getting through it in the time allotted. We are going to vote on this bill within the next three hours. Do my colleagues know why? Because it is going to make prime time news. That is why we are going to vote on it. This is an Alice in Wonderland budget process. We are going to get to the balanced budget by first increasing the deficit with retroactive tax cuts. It is slanted very much toward the wealthy people and the largest corporations in America.
John Joseph Moakley: “This is not just an esoteric procedural debate. I was insulted when the gentleman on the other said, ``Well, so what if…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing concerns about a budget bill and the lack of time to review it before a vote.
Share
More from John Joseph Moakley
Mr. Speaker, the bill for which this rule provides consideration addresses some very valid security concerns in Cuba. However, Mr. Speaker, I think they could be addressed in a better way. I believe the best way to engage Cuba is first to…
Mr. Speaker, once upon a time, not too very long ago, this House passed two very forward-thinking amendments. One would have lifted the American embargo on food and medicine going to Cuba. It passed the House by a vote of 301-116. The…
there was an additional $5 billion added that was not in the bill when we heard it.
I oppose this multi-trillion-dollar tax plan that benefits mostly the wealthy. Without the context of a budget, it is impossible for us to foresee what vital programs will be sacrificed. We do know, however, that under the President's…





