Actually, the gentleman is partially correct. I had a conversation with the chairman and I said, ``What have we got to look at; have you got a draft?'' And he says, ``No, I do not have a draft yet.'' I said, ``We would like to see what you have so we could talk about it.'' He says, ``Well, why don't you see what you can do and then come back and we will talk?'' But in the meantime the Committee on Commerce came down and other people from the committee came down and said that your committee was getting information from them.
John Joseph Moakley: “Actually, the gentleman is partially correct. I had a conversation with the chairman and I said, ``What have we got to…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing communication and collaboration between committees regarding draft legislation.
Share
More from John Joseph Moakley
There was an additional $5 billion added that was not in the bill when we heard it.
While the amendment purports to be about bank customer privacy, in reality it will significantly undermine the crucial law enforcement tool, the Bank Secrecy Act. The amendment would eliminate the mandatory reporting of suspicious…
Is this the bill that we will eventually work on, unlike the budget that we are voting on today that was constructed at 3 o'clock this morning without anybody testifying on it?
I had to catch a bus, but the only thing I want to be sure is that all the efforts that we go to in getting ready for this piece, if this is going to be the bill that we are ultimately going to vote on, unlike the budget bill that was put…





