First of all, the bills that my friend speaks of were single-purpose bills. This is a general bill that would allow anything to happen. Those were specific reasons to waive the two-thirds rule, but anything could be waived under this. Yes, last night, we did not want to present an obstacle by raising any ruckus in the Committee on Rules, but that does not mean that we voted in favor of it; we just did not raise any opposition. The fact is we had this rule for a purpose. The rule was not just created last night in the Committee on Rules, it is there as a management tool. One of our responsibilities in the Committee on Rules is to manage these bills primarily today so that we can keep the Government operating, which is a concern of everybody in this Chamber.
John Joseph Moakley: “First of all, the bills that my friend speaks of were single-purpose bills. This is a general bill that would allow…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of a general bill and the rules governing its management.
Share
More from John Joseph Moakley
While the amendment purports to be about bank customer privacy, in reality it will significantly undermine the crucial law enforcement tool, the Bank Secrecy Act. The amendment would eliminate the mandatory reporting of suspicious…
I had to catch a bus, but the only thing I want to be sure is that all the efforts that we go to in getting ready for this piece, if this is going to be the bill that we are ultimately going to vote on, unlike the budget bill that was put…
Although his is no longer with us in person, his kindness, his spirit, and his good works will be remembered forever.
Is this the bill that we will eventually work on, unlike the budget that we are voting on today that was constructed at 3 o'clock this morning without anybody testifying on it?





