first of all, the bills that my friend speaks of were single-purpose bills. This is a general bill that would allow anything to happen. Those were specific reasons to waive the two-thirds rule, but anything could be waived under this. Yes, last night, we did not want to present an obstacle by raising any ruckus in the Committee on Rules, but that does not mean that we voted in favor of it; we just did not raise any opposition. The fact is we had this rule for a purpose. The rule was not just created last night in the Committee on Rules, it is there as a management tool. One of our responsibilities in the Committee on Rules is to manage these bills primarily today so that we can keep the Government operating, which is a concern of everybody in this Chamber.
John Joseph Moakley: “first of all, the bills that my friend speaks of were single-purpose bills. This is a general bill that would allow…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of a general bill and the rules governing its management.
Share
More from John Joseph Moakley
at long last, the end is in sight. Today's Omnibus Appropriations bill contains all the major unfinished business remaining this session. It contains the Labor-Health and Human Services Appropriations bill the Commerce-Justice-State…
I rise this afternoon to remember a very dear friend and to mark the six month anniversary of his passing, April 23, 1999.
Mr. Speaker, American seniors are having a very hard time today, and the House could really do something about it. Today we could have passed a Democratic bill to make sure that every single senior citizen gets help with their expensive…
Mr. Speaker, as the distinguished dean of the Massachusetts delegation noted, H.R. 4118 raises legitimate security issues. However, the bill puts forth the worst possible recommendation on how to deal with these issues. Mr. Speaker, the…





