We can have the fight on taxes in another bill. But this amendment specifically says a point of order will lie against a bill if monies raised from tobacco, the sale of tobacco or cigarettes, if that money is spent to educate youth or to have stop-smoking programs, but yet if this money is sent back in the form of tax rebates, there is no point of order. Nobody is going to explain that problem to me. It cannot be explained away.
John Joseph Moakley: “We can have the fight on taxes in another bill. But this amendment specifically says a point of order will lie against a…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing an amendment related to tobacco revenue and its allocation during a House floor debate.
Share
More from John Joseph Moakley
Mr. Speaker, I think, yes, the Washington Post editorial said it all titled ``A Phony Issue.'' Again I will quote: ``Congressional Republicans have scheduled votes this week on a sizeable tax cut mainly for the better off, which they…
Mr. Speaker, normally suspension bills can be brought up only on Mondays and Tuesdays, but this rule will add two more days, Thursday and Friday, and it will add those days for one reason, for one resolution, a resolution that my…
there was an additional $5 billion added that was not in the bill when we heard it.
Mr. Speaker, you can easily have a voluntary program which, if people are satisfied with what kind of health insurance coverage and prescription benefit coverage that they have, if they are happy with that, they can continue that. If you…





