We can have the fight on taxes in another bill. But this amendment specifically says a point of order will lie against a bill if monies raised from tobacco, the sale of tobacco or cigarettes, if that money is spent to educate youth or to have stop-smoking programs, but yet if this money is sent back in the form of tax rebates, there is no point of order. Nobody is going to explain that problem to me. It cannot be explained away.
John Joseph Moakley: “We can have the fight on taxes in another bill. But this amendment specifically says a point of order will lie against a…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing an amendment related to tobacco revenue and its allocation during a House floor debate.
Share
More from John Joseph Moakley
Mr. Speaker, I urge defeat of the previous question. If the previous question is defeated, I will offer an amendment to the rule to require that Congress first adopt the budget resolution for fiscal year 2002 before the House takes up this…
Is this the bill that we will eventually work on, unlike the budget that we are voting on today that was constructed at 3 o'clock this morning without anybody testifying on it?
Paul Patrick Coughlin was an outstanding gentleman whose loyalty, warmth, and kindness touched the lives of many, many people in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.
While the amendment purports to be about bank customer privacy, in reality it will significantly undermine the crucial law enforcement tool, the Bank Secrecy Act. The amendment would eliminate the mandatory reporting of suspicious…





