Is it not true though that the gentleman's party promised open rules, more open rules than they had the year before?
John Joseph Moakley: “Is it not true though that the gentleman's party promised open rules, more open rules than they had the year before?”
On the recordMarch 7, 1995
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Questioning the commitment to open rules by the opposing party.
Share
More from John Joseph Moakley
Oct 25, 1999
I rise this afternoon to remember a very dear friend and to mark the six month anniversary of his passing, April 23, 1999.
Sep 28, 2000
I am talking about what is not in the bill, and what is not in the bill is going to help protect the lives and safety of the people in the Northeast. Two years ago, we had an elderly couple freeze to death because they did not have money…
Mar 23, 2000
There was an additional $5 billion added that was not in the bill when we heard it.
Mar 23, 2000
Is this the bill that we will eventually work on, unlike the budget that we are voting on today that was constructed at 3 o'clock this morning without anybody testifying on it?





