Is it not true though that the gentleman's party promised open rules, more open rules than they had the year before?
John Joseph Moakley: “Is it not true though that the gentleman's party promised open rules, more open rules than they had the year before?”
Editor's note · Context
Questioning the commitment to open rules by the opposing party.
Share
More from John Joseph Moakley
Mr. Speaker, this rule was only reported out of the Committee on Rules less than 3 hours ago. But because my Republican colleagues just enacted martial law, we are considering this rule the same day it was reported, without the typical…
Is this the bill that we will eventually work on, unlike the budget that we are voting on today that was constructed at 3 o'clock this morning without anybody testifying on it?
This debate is going to be constrained today in the House. It is being held at an unusually early hour, with little notice to Members, except at 11 o'clock last night; and the debate itself is constrained by this rule to 2 hours, although…
Mr. Chairman, I favor very much the amendment of the gentleman from West Virginia (Mr. Mollohan). I hope it passes. But, Mr. Chairman, the VA-HUD appropriations bill that we are considering is really seriously underfunded. It is…





