I would like to have the attention of the gentleman from New York [Mr. Solomon]. I know that the gentleman has got scheduled hearings on the term limit bill up before the committee this morning. Since we are not going to take it up until the end of the month, and we are discussing two major amendments to the rules that are taking place here on the floor, does the gentleman not think we should be on the floor making sure this thing comes out right this time rather than going up to the committee to take evidence and term limits where we have so much time in order to put it together?
John Joseph Moakley: “I would like to have the attention of the gentleman from New York [Mr. Solomon]. I know that the gentleman has got…”
On the recordMarch 9, 1995
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the timing and importance of addressing term limits on the House floor.
Share
More from John Joseph Moakley
May 18, 2000
Some of my colleagues are alluding to things that happened many years ago. We are talking about some atrocities that happened as recently as March of 1999 by two major generals; other atrocities in 1998 in Colombia. So some of the…
Mar 23, 2000
there was an additional $5 billion added that was not in the bill when we heard it.
Jul 12, 2000
Mr. Speaker, I think, yes, the Washington Post editorial said it all titled ``A Phony Issue.'' Again I will quote: ``Congressional Republicans have scheduled votes this week on a sizeable tax cut mainly for the better off, which they…





