I do not know what script it was the gentleman was reading from, but this is not about violating law. This is a sense of the House resolution that has no power. If the gentleman really felt as strong as he says, why does he not get the proper piece of legislation before the House. This is the payment of legal fees and who is responsible. It is not about violating the law.
John Joseph Moakley: “I do not know what script it was the gentleman was reading from, but this is not about violating law. This is a sense of…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the nature and power of a House resolution regarding legal fees.
Share
More from John Joseph Moakley
I rise this afternoon to remember a very dear friend and to mark the six month anniversary of his passing, April 23, 1999.
Mr. Speaker, as most people know, the Twenty-First Amendment to the Constitution ended prohibition. It also bestowed upon the States the authority to write their own liquor laws. The problem, Mr. Speaker, is there is no interstate…
This debate is going to be constrained today in the House. It is being held at an unusually early hour, with little notice to Members, except at 11 o'clock last night; and the debate itself is constrained by this rule to 2 hours, although…
Mr. Speaker, once upon a time, not too very long ago, this House passed two very forward-thinking amendments. One would have lifted the American embargo on food and medicine going to Cuba. It passed the House by a vote of 301-116. The…





