But the reason for this mandate is to stop this spending to take place, stop penalizing small companies. But if we say, we are going to tax them and then someone says, well, a point of order, and then someone says, we will give it back as a tax break, that company is still paying the tax even though that is going back as a tax break rather than going into the industry it is supposed to police.
John Joseph Moakley: “But the reason for this mandate is to stop this spending to take place, stop penalizing small companies. But if we say…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the impact of taxation on small companies during a debate.
Share
More from John Joseph Moakley
Mr. Speaker, when the House version of this bill came to the floor a few weeks ago, it was a massive tort reform package masquerading as a way to exterminate the millennium bug. The version of that bill was dangerous and probably would…
Mr. Speaker, as the distinguished dean of the Massachusetts delegation noted, H.R. 4118 raises legitimate security issues. However, the bill puts forth the worst possible recommendation on how to deal with these issues. Mr. Speaker, the…
Mr. Speaker, to listen to my Republican colleagues singing the praises of this bill, one would think it was going to change the lives of millions of Americans the minute the ink was dry. But before anybody starts spending the inheritance…
Paul Patrick Coughlin was an outstanding gentleman whose loyalty, warmth, and kindness touched the lives of many, many people in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.





