But the reason for this mandate is to stop this spending to take place, stop penalizing small companies. But if we say, we are going to tax them and then someone says, well, a point of order, and then someone says, we will give it back as a tax break, that company is still paying the tax even though that is going back as a tax break rather than going into the industry it is supposed to police.
John Joseph Moakley: “But the reason for this mandate is to stop this spending to take place, stop penalizing small companies. But if we say…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the impact of taxation on small companies during a debate.
Share
More from John Joseph Moakley
Although his is no longer with us in person, his kindness, his spirit, and his good works will be remembered forever.
I had to catch a bus, but the only thing I want to be sure is that all the efforts that we go to in getting ready for this piece, if this is going to be the bill that we are ultimately going to vote on, unlike the budget bill that was put…
While the amendment purports to be about bank customer privacy, in reality it will significantly undermine the crucial law enforcement tool, the Bank Secrecy Act. The amendment would eliminate the mandatory reporting of suspicious…
Is this the bill that we will eventually work on, unlike the budget that we are voting on today that was constructed at 3 o'clock this morning without anybody testifying on it?





