during the 2008 financial crisis and the $700 billion bailout for giant banks, the Federal Reserve exploited another authority to shovel money out the back door and into the hands of those giant banks. For the first time ever, the Fed started paying interest on overnight funds that big financial institutions deposit with the Fed. This was a dream come true for those financial giants--no risk and lots of free money printed by the Fed. How much money? Seven hundred eighty-five billion dollars since 2008. Some of that money could have been used to pay down the national debt or fund tax cuts or whatever Congress wanted. Instead, public money went straight into the pockets of giant banks. And the Fed has a very convoluted argument about why they should be allowed to pay interest, claiming it helps them set interest rates. But no one is fooled. Before 2008, the Fed managed interest rates while paying zero on overnight funds and never had a problem. Let's call this out for what it is: another taxpayer subsidy for giant banks. If another emergency happens and the Fed needs authority to lend out money like that, make them come to Congress, and let's get a vote on it. Last year alone, the banks earned $270 billion in profits. Jamie Dimon made $39 million. Other megabanks' CEOs made at least $30 million. The banking industry does not need another subsidy from American taxpayers. This bipartisan proposal would end that subsidy. I urge a ``yes'' vote on Paul No. 3761.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the Federal Reserve's financial practices and a proposal to end taxpayer subsidies for banks.
Share
More from Elizabeth Warren
You committed to bringing ‘radical transparency’ to the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), but your ongoing refusal to release these deals raises questions about whether the Trump administration is trying to hide the fact that…
Given the findings of our review, we urge your support for codifying the President’s executive order into law and ensuring that the order has lasting results.
If (safety regulation rollbacks) were motivated solely by ideology it would reflect a dangerously bad set of policies by the Trump administration. But the specter of corruption – and quid pro quo politics – casts a darker shadow over these…
I was the very first Senator to endorse Peggy because she’s the fighter we need in Washington.





