I just think it is sad to be on that side of the coin.
Ninety-eight percent of the scientists are now saying the following. We now face a choice between an unpleasant planet, unpleasant planet, a...
I am going to work my heart out with you on that.
Unless Arak is neutralized so that it is not able to produce plutonium that can be reprocessed for a weapon, we will not have a deal.
We have a very clear policy of trying to prevent the spread of enrichment and reprocessing technology.
Now I have heard that the right agreement here includes a 1-year breakout period. A duration of 15 to 20 years would be the agreement.
I think it is very important for the United States to understand exactly what will be the level of intrusiveness into each one of these site...
I think a no enrichment policy is the correct policy, especially as it sets a precedent for Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates, and others.
It just will trigger a proliferation cascading effect if there is not kind of a sense that there is equal treatment.
Again, our greatest concern is that it would be kind of a fulfillment of President Kennedy's warning that there would be 20 to 25 countries ...
I think the question is, are you bequeathing to your successor a productive framework? Are you bequeathing the tools?