this was not a half bad resolution as it was produced by the gentleman from New York (Mr. Gilman) and the gentleman from Connecticut (Mr. Gejdenson) out of the committee. In fact, what it said was that the President would be able to use his existing legal authorities to reduce, to suspend, or to terminate assistance to these OPEC nations, including military aid or arms sales. So in other words, if the heads of all these counties are going to go into a room and say, they are not getting any more oil from us or we are going to reduce it dramatically, then leaders from our country are going to go into a room and say, well, they are not going to get what we have got in our country that they want. But by the time that it had been transformed by the miracle of the Committee on Rules, every meaningful part of this resolution has been removed; and all we have left is, basically, a resolution which says this oil crisis is really a very bad thing. Now, we are all going to agree with that. It is a bad thing. But the Committee on Rules had a chance to put into order for us to debate out here on the floor the reauthorization of the strategic petroleum reserve, which is what our President can use to talk to the leaders of their country in deploying our oil reserves, 560 million barrels of oil.…
Ed Markey: “this was not a half bad resolution as it was produced by the gentleman from New York (Mr. Gilman) and the gentleman from…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing a resolution related to OPEC nations and the strategic petroleum reserve.
Share
More from Ed Markey
Today’s unanimous committee passage of my Youth AI Privacy Act is a huge step forward for protecting kids’ privacy and safety in the age of AI,” said Senator Markey. “This vote demonstrates bipartisan support for robust privacy safeguards…
I am also seeking information related to ICE’s harmful, nontransparent operation of the Intensive Supervision Appearance Program (“ISAP”)—an alternative to detention program—in the Commonwealth.
In addition to mandatory notification of use outlined in this rule, the FDA should be using strong, science-based standards to independently review every chemical proposed for use in our food.
American children and their families deserve robust evidence-based immunization recommendations that are rooted in science.





