I am a friend of telecommunications competition. I know telecommunications competition. This bill is not a friend of telecommunications competition. In fact, what has happened since 1997, after the 1996 Telecommunications Act passed, was that broadband deployment went across the country at such a rapid pace that now somewhere between, depending upon how we look at it, 70 to 80 percent of all Americans now have access to broadband. That did not happen by accident. It happened because we had a vigorous competitive telecommunications policy. That is why the Bells do not like it. But it has ensured that upwards of $60 billion of investment that otherwise would not have been made was put out into the marketplace. We do not want to change that. The bill in 1996 was a paranoia-inducement act. This bill is meant to be a sedative, a calming influence, so the Bells do not have to feel that paranoia any longer. If we do that, we will be looking at the future through a rearview mirror.
Ed Markey: “I am a friend of telecommunications competition. I know telecommunications competition. This bill is not a friend of…”
On the recordFebruary 27, 2002
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the impact of telecommunications policy and competition during a committee meeting.
Share
More from Ed Markey
Aug 11, 2026
The agency should also address the thousands of potential toxins already used that the GRAS loophole has rubberstamped since its creation.
Aug 14, 2026
We must also never forget that there are still more than five other Americans detained in Russia. I urge the Trump administration to use Robert’s case as motivation to continue to advocate for the release of others wrongfully detained in…
Aug 12, 2026
While the rule claims to offer ‘flexibility’ in desegregation compliance efforts, the Administration’s actions reveal that its goal is to throw away the umbrella, not find a raincoat instead.





