We do not use biological weapons in Afghanistan. We do not use chemical weapons in Afghanistan. We do not use this present generation of nuclear earth penetrators in Afghanistan because we know it is wrong, and because we just have to ask al Qaeda how well our existing conventional bombs did in destroying them. I have not heard anyone say that there was some problem that needed nuclear weapons to be dropped on Afghanistan. The consequences of opposing the Markey amendment will be that a new generation of nuclear testing, breaching the test ban between the United States and the Soviet Union, sending a signal to countries all around the world that nuclear weapons are now usable, even though we do not need them in Afghanistan, we do not need them in Iraq; we can destroy, level those countries. If we use nuclear weapons in Tora Bora, it will only be in order to ensure that the rubble is bouncing, not that we have destroyed the entire country already with conventional weapons. This is the wrong road to go down. We are breaching a barrier which would be a very serious mistake for our country.
Ed Markey: “We do not use biological weapons in Afghanistan. We do not use chemical weapons in Afghanistan. We do not use this…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of nuclear weapons use in Afghanistan during a floor speech.
Share
More from Ed Markey
We must also never forget that there are still more than five other Americans detained in Russia. I urge the Trump administration to use Robert’s case as motivation to continue to advocate for the release of others wrongfully detained in…
“Today’s unanimous committee passage of my Youth AI Privacy Act is a huge step forward for protecting kids’ privacy and safety in the age of AI,” said Senator Markey. “This vote demonstrates bipartisan support for robust privacy safeguards…
We urge the Department to withdraw this proposed rule, ensure that the federal government upholds the civil rights of all students, and work to ensure all students can attend schools that are not segregated.
FERC has a statutory obligation to ensure that consolidation in the energy sector serves the public interest, not corporate profits. It is impossible to see how this consolidation will not put the public interest at risk.





