I agree. Let's come to the basics. The libel laws in this country are controlled by a key society, by the Supreme Court in 1964, probably the New York Times versus Sullivan. It was a nine nothing decision, Anderson, which said that in order to -- for a public figure to sue somebody for a libel and succeed not only have the proof that the statement, the critical statement was, you know, false. But you also have to prove actual malice that the person or the publication making the critical statement knowingly, you know, misdescribed or did it with malice.
David Gergen: “I agree. Let's come to the basics. The libel laws in this country are controlled by a key society, by the Supreme Court…”
On the recordJanuary 9, 2018
Source
transcripts.cnn.comEditor's note · Context
David Gergen explains the legal standards for libel cases involving public figures.
Share
More from David Gergen
Dec 29, 2022
But I think, to go to David Urban's point, what was she calling about? Well, she was calling, she testified, because she thought there was fraud that had been committed, and had not yet been explored, and that it ought to be studied before…
Oct 27, 2022
For Donald Trump to go for a 24-plus hours without a word being said is an outrage in and of itself. This is a man who is seeking the nomination of a major political party, very likely to get it. And now look at the leadership he is…
Dec 6, 2022
The midterms really helped him. They transformed the race, best midterm elections for any president in 20 years.





