No, it would be a serious mistake to go without a chief of staff. You know, there was a time a very early time, when Democrats tend to tend not to have very strong chief of staff and Republicans like the pyramidal system with a strong chief of staff at the top.
David Gergen: “No, it would be a serious mistake to go without a chief of staff. You know, there was a time a very early time, when…”
Editor's note · Context
Gergen warns against the idea of the White House operating without a chief of staff, emphasizing the complexity of the role.
Share
More from David Gergen
For Donald Trump to go for a 24-plus hours without a word being said is an outrage in and of itself. This is a man who is seeking the nomination of a major political party, very likely to get it. And now look at the leadership he is…
But I think, to go to David Urban's point, what was she calling about? Well, she was calling, she testified, because she thought there was fraud that had been committed, and had not yet been explored, and that it ought to be studied before…
It's very, very big. Not legally, but politically, it's a very, very big deal.
I think this the very idea that in 2024, we may have two men running against each other Biden and Trump, who would both be in their 80s if elected, that it too is enough to say, well, what are we doing here?





