I think there are additional elements that have been forgotten and there's a path -- there's a narrative about the president's entire activities as president. The trail that we have seen, the amount of obstruction, the amount of dismissal of the rule of law. I think that's a pretty powerful case if you can make it simply and with simply -- with great clarity I would lean in that direction.
David Gergen discusses the importance of including obstruction in the impeachment narrative against the president.
Share
More from David Gergen
But I think, to go to David Urban's point, what was she calling about? Well, she was calling, she testified, because she thought there was fraud that had been committed, and had not yet been explored, and that it ought to be studied before…
I don't think Trump is out of the woods, even though his poll numbers are not only staying up, they have actually been strengthened some.
I think it's going to take something usually unexpected or a dramatic change in his health or a prison sentence to stop him.
Other voices in this conversation
