On the recordSeptember 19, 2018
It's just hard to know how you can put two people and conclude what's the truth, if you have no real information about what other parties say.
Source
transcripts.cnn.comDavid Gergen: “It's just hard to know how you can put two people and conclude what's the truth, if you have no real information about…”
Editor's note · Context
Gergen emphasizes the difficulty of determining the truth without a real investigation and the implications for the upcoming vote.
Share
More from David Gergen
Jan 12, 2023
It's very, very big. Not legally, but politically, it's a very, very big deal.
Dec 29, 2022
But I think, to go to David Urban's point, what was she calling about? Well, she was calling, she testified, because she thought there was fraud that had been committed, and had not yet been explored, and that it ought to be studied before…
Oct 27, 2022
For Donald Trump to go for a 24-plus hours without a word being said is an outrage in and of itself. This is a man who is seeking the nomination of a major political party, very likely to get it. And now look at the leadership he is…
Jul 2, 2023
If he comes out and throws cold water on this, then I don't think it goes anywhere.
Other voices in this conversation
