I was surprised that she continued to go negative on him, because I don't see the evidence.
David Gergen: “I was surprised that she continued to go negative on him, because I don't see the evidence.”
On the recordApril 15, 2008
Source
transcripts.cnn.comEditor's note · Context
Gergen expresses surprise at Clinton's negative campaigning against Obama, questioning its effectiveness based on polling data.
Share
More from David Gergen
May 9, 2022
I think this the very idea that in 2024, we may have two men running against each other Biden and Trump, who would both be in their 80s if elected, that it too is enough to say, well, what are we doing here?
Dec 29, 2022
But I think, to go to David Urban's point, what was she calling about? Well, she was calling, she testified, because she thought there was fraud that had been committed, and had not yet been explored, and that it ought to be studied before…
Nov 23, 2020
The Trump administration is in the courts, and it is very clear they have failed miserably.





